User talk:Jonathan Harold Koszeghi/Archive 10

February 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Into You Like a Train. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=478267708 here]. Vrenator    talk   16:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Grey's Anatomy (season 2), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Residency and Brooke Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Meredith Grey with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meredith_Grey&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 19:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Meredith Grey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Tgeairn (talk) 19:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Meredith Grey
Please stop reinserting your edits to this article. Why are you removing valid maintenance templates without addressing the problems in the article, and changing to an inappropriate genre-specific infobox which is not relevant to Grey's Anatomy, and is not used in any other Grey's Anatomy articles? Frickative 19:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Grey's Anatomy Season Pages
Hi Lorin Schonfeld. You have been continuously adding unsourced, over detailed information to Grey's Anatomy season page articles. None of your statements are verified except one on ratings which already existed in the article. If you add your edits in again, I will be inclined to report you to Wikipedia. Adding unsourced information to an article is not tolerated on Wikipedia. If you would like to go through your edits to the pages, write only necessary information (not every detail of the whole season) and find sources to justify your statements, then go for it. But if you continue to add over detailed, unsourced information, you will be reported. No further warnings will be given. TRLIJC19  (  talk  ) 19:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC)