User talk:Jonathan O'Donnell

Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!


 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.


 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: . If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.


 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 13:33, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Re ausbio cleanups
I have responded on my talk page. Keep up the good work. Thanks. --Scott Davis Talk 04:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Current Events Oz & NZ
I suggest you include your message at Talk:Current events in Oceania rather than putting copies on the talk pages of multiple editors. In general, we don't want people to promote their own websites on Wikipedia, but a polite mention as you have made on talk pages is entirely appropriate.-gadfium 01:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
The current system seems to be working really well :) --Peta 07:05, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Query
Hi Jonathan - nice work with the Archbishops of Sydney stuff - but I'm not sure why you removed the contemporary online reference to the Australian dictionary of biography since it is a very contemporary reference. I'm keen to know why. I would have thought a link to a page (which represents modern scholarship) is useful - even if it shows only that the scholars haven't cnhaged their minds or found new information? Doesn't it help with the isse of verification on wiki. Why not keep both? Look forward to your reply. I thought not to replace it before I asked. Cor Unum 09:29, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * See my response at User talk:Njamesdebien --Jonathan O&#39;Donnell 20:28, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello
Hi Jonathan, I sent you an email about a week ago in response to your message. Did you recieve it? regards, --Nick Dowling 00:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

John Laurence Rentoul article
Hi Jonathan, thanks for adding the John Laurence Rentoul article. However there seems to be some doubt about the public domain status of the DAB in other parts of the world (inside Australia is OK) - see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australia/To-do/Australian Dictionary of Biography. So it's best to write an article based on the DAB (and preferably the ADB) and avoid copying paragraphs of text from the DAB. I've been re-writing some articles on people from the DAB so they no longer contain chunks of text copied from there. Diverman (talk) 11:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)


 * That is a pity. It was easy to copy from the DAB and wikify. Then again, any new articles will be better for being written from scratch, I guess. Jonathan O&#39;Donnell (talk) 03:40, 27 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, it would have been easier to do a more direct transfer from the DAB, but I think the articles are better if they include info from the ADB. I've updated the Rentoul article, incorporating inline refs to the ADB, adding sections, more categories and filling in the template.
 * If you feel like helping out, there are articles here which could do with some re-wording and introduction of material from the ADB and other sources. Thanks in advance :)
 * Diverman (talk) 06:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

About "yayo" language
I've reread the encyclopedia, and found I haven't make error in citing them. But I think it might be "yayoi", a historical period in Japanese history. So I corrected this misspelling. It might be that the original writer misspelled the word. But thank you anyway. Dreamback1116 (talk) 12:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello Jonathan. You created a lot of good, valid and well referenced articles on Australian history. I don't think your article creations need to be listed at Special:NewPages and I would like to change your user rights to "autopatrolled", just for the sake of reducing the workload of new page patrollers. Please, let me know if you agree. Keep up the good work :) --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:25, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Vejvančický. I would be honoured. Please change my user rights to "autopatrolled". Thanks for that. --Jonathan O&#39;Donnell (talk) 04:20, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, done. Thanks for your contributions, Jonathan. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Melbourne meetup
Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 05:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Disambiguation (metadata)


The article Disambiguation (metadata) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * One sentence article on a topic that is non-notable, does not cite any sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Proud User (talk) 20:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Re: Swan Hill
No worries. The correct thing to do would've been to contact the appropriate WikiProject's talk page/notice board ... in this case the Australian Wikipedians' notice board. Graham 87 05:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)