User talk:Jonathancloud

Please do not attempt to post link spam on Wikipedia. Thank you. - Lucky 6.9 05:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Not sure what this is about. The article posted was informative and linked only the company's main sites. If this is causing a problem, these can be deleted or displayed in a non-HTML form (as below).

Agel (Agel Enterprises, LLC) is a new networking marketing company that distributes nutritional products using a patent-pending "gel suspension technology." The company was founded in March 2005 and its headquarters are in Provo, Utah, and is currently operating in 41 countries.

Products include MIN (vitimins and minerals), FIT (weight control), EXO (antioxidants), UMI (fucoidan), OHM (energy booster), FLX (Glucosamine, Condroiton, Celadrin, & MSM), and PRO, a soon to be released protein pack. An additional 80 products are said to be in the pipeline.

The company also claims to have a unique compensation program, that incentivizes people to make others successful by paying a bonus on what others earn.

For more information, see the company's web site at www[dot]agel[dot]com, and its product information site at www[dot]geldocs[dot]com.

Thanks, Jonathan. This looks much better and does establish notability. Still needs a format tweak or two, but I can help with that. - Lucky 6.9 05:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Fine with me. Please make the changes or tell me what's needed. Thanks.

Not a problem; you're all set. If I've made any errors in fact, by all means feel free to adjust them as necessary. - Lucky 6.9 06:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. I think the only changes I would make would be to reduce and simplify some statements, and remove the comparisons to other companies, since both the products and the compensation plan are different from what I have seen before, and the comparison may be misleading. For example, the contents of the package are not liquids but are more like pie fillings, and while the nature of the packaging may be similar to that of Capri drinks I'm not sure why one would bring them in here. I also think the company would dispute that its compensation plan is like Amway's (which I have not looked at enough to know whether the comparison is fair or not). I tried to make the original as factual and non-judgemental as possible, and would be inclined to revert to that if possible. If I get a chance I'll post a revised version. Thanks.