User talk:Jonathanrice

Speedy deletion nomination of ClickBank


A tag has been placed on ClickBank, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shirt58 (talk) 13:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ClickBank


The article ClickBank has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. The only verifiable sources are a press release and two pages on a trade promotional site, one of which even says that it was written by the "Public Relations Director".

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:21, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
I see that at Talk:ClickBank you have written "I am a third party, not an employee of ClickBank". That is likely to give the impression that you are independent of ClickBank, and not editing for them, although it does not explicitly say so. Can you clarify this, by stating whether you are editing on behalf of the owners of ClickBank, and whether you are paid by them? I trust that you would not wish to give a misleading impression. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)