User talk:Jonatpower

They appeared to have forgotten to tell you the article you created is up for deletion now at Articles for deletion/Jonathan Power. You need to comment there in order to save it from deletion.  D r e a m Focus  03:48, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Username block
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Jonatpower, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I noticed that via a post here, you stated that you are someone other than Jonathan Power. It is against our username policy to have a username that makes you out to be someone other than yourself (ie, that you are John Smith when you are actually Jane Green), so you will need to choose a new username accordingly or open up a new account. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, Jonatpower. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Notability
I thought I'd explain notability a little more. Basically what it all boils down to is coverage in reliable sources and verifiability. There has to be coverage about Power in sources that are independent and in reliable places. For example, if one of the papers he works for were to write about him, it would be in their best interest to write about him positively. Because of that, we consider such reports to be WP:PRIMARY sources, meaning that they are directly related to Powers. Also, any articles written by Powers would be seen as primary sources as well. Just being a journalist doesn't automatically give notability and his association with notable persons does not extend notability either, as notability is WP:NOTINHERITED.

By large we mostly require sources to just back up notability rather than verify things, but in some instances it is required. For example, when it comes to the film It's Ours Whatever They Say, almost all of the sources I'm finding list someone else as the director. Even the official listings for the film list another person as the director. Because the BFI and other places list her as the director, we'd need something other than his say-so that he was the director. What I recommend as far as that goes is that you get Barraclough to contact the various film locations (BFI, MIFF, etc) and correct this in their systems. Until that happens, the information will continually get removed from Power's article if it ever gets re-created. Even after that gets fixed, there's still a question over whether or not the award is enough to merit being kept on that basis alone. Most awards aren't enough to keep on just the award alone. Of the rest of the awards, most can't give notability because they're considered to be trivial per Wikipedia's guidelines. I have to highlight that because while an award might seem like quite an achievement to you or me, Wikipedia tends to view less than 5% of any awards ever given as able to give notability in any context. That's because there are so many awards out there and at some point they have to draw the line.

In any case, at this point it's all up to WP:DELETIONREVIEW. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)