User talk:Jone.Hu

Welcome!
Hello, Jone.Hu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 23:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mason Ji has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mason Ji. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:08, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mason Ji has been accepted
 Mason Ji, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Sulfurboy (talk) 23:10, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Mason_Ji help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of Mason Ji for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mason Ji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mason Ji until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. m.o.p 20:17, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry on Wikipedia
Hi Jone.Hu,

I just wanted to let you know about Wikipedia's policy on "sock puppetry". Due to the nature of sockpuppetry, we take it very seriously when editors attempt to mislead or influence Wikipedia processes in an illegitimate matter. As a result, your other account, Mrque12 has been blocked by one of our checkusers. Normally, the sockpuppet creator's other accounts would be blocked as well, but, due to the fact that you've not done anything too insidious, you're being let off with a warning. Please take this warning to heart; there will not be a next time, and other administrators may not react so kindly to somebody lying to them. If you've any questions, I'm happy to answer them here. Best, m.o.p  19:12, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I will take your note to heart and it will never happen again. In the haste of things, I created a new account to get an idea down, but I assure you it will never happen again. Thank you, Jone.Hu (talk) 19:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm glad that you acknowledged that the account is yours, but the explanation defies belief. You made this edit last night at 23:54, somehow logged out and forgot your password, then created the other account two minutes later. Amazingly, you remembered your password this afternoon, but again logged out to edit from the sockpuppet account before coming back to this one. Further disruption will not be taken lightly, at least not by this administrator. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will take this warning very seriously. I don't know why, but my account was logged out after I made that comment! In haste, I created the other one, thinking that too many comments from the author of the page wouldn't be good, and didn't think too much about it... I then tried to change the password for the old one, and jotted down the new password last night. I realize now that this is all wrong and I SHOULD NOT do that, and I am very sorry. Today, I realized that it was bad of me to do that, and I didn't want to impede the deletion process, so I logged back in to the other account to change the previous comment. I know that I've caused disruption and confusion and I sincerely apologize. I promise nothing of this sort will ever happen again from me. Thank you so much for your tolerance and your forgiveness. Jone.Hu (talk) 20:21, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Per my message below, I've blocked you from editing for two weeks. Despite multiple opportunities to come clean, own your mistake, and move on - something that is absolutely valid and respectable - you continued to (not once, but twice) attempt to pass off the actions of your other account as just a minor bout of forgetfulness. I don't take kindly to being strung along. Please take some time to think about this. You are welcome to return to editing after the block expires; as before, please feel free to leave any questions on your talk page. Best, m.o.p  21:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I willingly accept this punishment, and will continue to follow the AfD. Again, I am sincerely sorry for all the trouble I have caused.Jone.Hu (talk) 21:15, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. m.o.p 20:56, 30 October 2017 (UTC)


 * You are incredibly lucky to get away with a two week block. The absurd string of lies that you posted at Articles for deletion/Mason Ji, which you can't possibly have expected us to believe unless either you thought that we were all stupid or else you are yourself stupid, the implausible lies you posted to try to wriggle out of the fact that your blatant sockpuppetry had been discovered, the fact that your sole purpose in editing here in the first place was to post an article which consisted virtually entirely of lies, and your gross dishonesty in falsifying sources to try to hide your previous history of dishonesty, add up to more than enough justification for blocking you indefinitely. You were lucky in getting blocked by an administrator who chose to be much more generous than most administrators would probably have been, and certainly more so than I would have been. If you choose to come back to edit after the block expires, be warned that it is very unlikely that you will be let off so lightly a second time if you show the slightest sign of editing disruptively. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Just one more lie that I have discovered. On English Wikipedia you have claimed that you have no connection to Mason Ji, yet on Wikimedia commons you uploaded a photograph of him which you said you took yourself. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)