User talk:Jone Rohne Nester/Archive 2

Hi Jone. Sorry i did not do it intentionally as am new to wikipedia and was trying to figure things out. I have taken your feedback and will learn more about some guidelines. I have also made significant changes to the article. Please review the same. Appreciate your feedback. Apologies for my behaviour. User: DG999 — Preceding unsigned comment added by DG999 (talk • contribs) 11:49, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

CSD for Honeywell group
Hi there, I have changed your CSD for Honeywell group into a redirect to Honeywell. "Honeywell group" could be a search term people use, so it's good to have that redirect and discourage additional articles being created. Regards pseudonym June 10, 2017 talk 11:58, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello talk, Thanks a lot. I am aware of the existence of an Honeywell article. But the Honeywell Group I am trying to create is a different one. In fact, it is a group registered in Nigeria. It is only a co-incidence that there is an Honeywell in the USA. Please advice.
 * Ah, good point. I have moved this to Draft:Honeywell Group, where you are welcome to edit the page. I have removed most of the previous contents as I noticed it had been taken from existing sources, which is a violation of Wikipedia's guidelines on copyright infringement. I invite you to create an article in your own words about the company, but please ensure that all claims are cites with verifable third party references that can establish notability of the firm. If you have any questions, please let me know on my personal talk page. I am happy to review the page when done and help move to main article space. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 13:17, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot. I will keep you posted.

Declined speedy deletion nomination of My Daddy My Heart
Hello Jone Rohne Nester. Speedy deletion work is important and I do appreciate the effort. I would just ask that you please review the criteria carefully because accuracy is also important. On that issue, I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of My Daddy My Heart as constituting unambiguous advertising or promotion under CSD G11. That criterion did not apply because the page did not contain any promotional text I could see, much less being "exclusively promotional", and that would need to be "fundamentally rewritten" to become encyclopedic.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your message and feedback! In my opinion this article failed W policies on multiple levels but I chose G11 , probably not the best option. Anyways, as far as I can see I am not the only one who proposed this article for deletion. But once again thanks for your feedback! Jone Rohne Nester (talk) 10:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Again. That's not the issue. There are different deletion processes for different content. This was not subject to G11. Period. That does not mean it should not be deleted but through the proper process. There are pages that do not meet any speedy deletion criteria, so they must be prodded or taken to AfD. There are also pages that meet none and also cannot be prodded but can only be taken to AfD or another discussion process, depending on what page is involved. You have to learn the processes and what is within and without their ambits to known which to use for what. For the speedy deletion criteria, the parameters are highly refined and generally strictly construed. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''At two AfDs, you have stated that individuals who have been good enough to play first-class cricket are WP:MILL. I would point out to you that WP operates a strict WP:BLP policy and you must not make assertions of that nature to denigrate a person's prowess. '' Jack &#124; talk page 15:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Move on and stop threaten others View AfD, Jone Rohne Nester (talk) 15:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Given your comments at the AfD, we will take this to WP:ANI. I'll send you an official notice shortly. Jack &#124; talk page 16:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure, please go on and block everyone who disagrees with you about cricket, way to go Jone Rohne Nester (talk) 16:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

WP:ANI
Please see ANI discussion. Jack &#124; talk page 16:28, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to WP:WikiProject Biography
I see you have contributed to biographical articles at the start. You may participate at WP:WikiProject Biography, the WikiProject that handles such articles in wide scope. --George Ho (talk) 22:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Too fast speedy deletion nomination
Please don't nominate articles for A1 or A3 too soon after their creation. Many newbie editors first start with the title or a too short sentence, and then add more information in a second or third edit. See e.g. Vasireddy Nayaks where your speedy deletion nomination was too fast. In this case, the editor continued to add information, but in other cases such a speedy may discourage a new editor and cause them to stop editing alltogether. Fram (talk) 09:03, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Link spam
Hello. Repeatedly adding links towards a web site that you are "fan of", in the middle of article paragraphs that are already sourced, is precisely what WP:LINKSPAM is. So don't do it, or you will have to explain yourself to the broader community.

On a side note, please stop marking as "minor" edits that clearly are not. Refer to WP:MINOR Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2017 (UTC)


 * You, clearly, don't understand concept of spam. I would suggest you to read WP:WPSPAM before your next edit. 1) Since when articles written by scientists are spam? 2)in the middle of article paragraphs that are already sourced - a) they are not properly sourced  b) not sure if you are struggling to formulate your critique properly, but whether link is added in the middle of  paragraph  or not makes no difference whatsoever. If you will follow this nonsense rationale for removing sources, I would suggest to start with e.g. BBC, there are millions of links, in the middle of article paragraphs... And yes, I'm happy to explain myself to the broader community as I already did many times and I stand by my opinion.  It seems that you are another "me too" person so I'm not gonna waste my time arguing with you and I will move on. Please pay attention to the quality of your edits or we might end up on the same "explain yourself" community page. Jone Rohne Nester (talk) 07:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Niche Hunt


A tag has been placed on Niche Hunt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Biwom (talk) 03:40, 19 August 2017 (UTC)