User talk:Jones5153

Welcome!
Hello, Jones5153, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Scopecreep (talk) 14:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Copyrighted contributions
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. Scopecreep (talk) 14:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of UCL Energy Institute


A tag has been placed on UCL Energy Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Scopecreep (talk) 15:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article: not for promotionalism primarily, but because the text was a copy from various pages of their website. This is not permitted: previously published copyright material cannot be used on Wikipedia. Even  if you own the copyright  or  can get permission and  follow the full formal procedures according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. It's always best to rewrite.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. They don't usually want to know the details of government. And keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of  press releases or  web sites, which are usually more expansive. Also, a Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. The references in the article were entirely from their own site, or were trivial press releases or listings. What is needed is articles about the Institute itself--not its individual researchers, but the Institute. It has proven in the past quite difficult to find this sort of material for most similar organizations, and we generally do not have articles at the Institute or Department level, except for the very most famous.

What I suggest you do instead is add a section on this to the article on The Bartlett. Two or three paragraphs would be about the correct length, but write them yourself, using the web pages only to provide the information. Include a link for all faculty there who have articles in Wikipedia And try to add at least one external source if you can. Ideally, you might then want to go on and add similar sections for the other constituent institutes, I work frequently on articles on subjects like this, and I'll be glad to help. I am emailing you the text, but please don't reuse it in its present form.

 DGG ( talk ) 17:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)