User talk:Jonmackenzie

April 2013
Hello, Jonmackenzie. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Scilly Now & Then, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 06:51, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scilly Now & Then


The article Scilly Now & Then has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern: Scilly Now & Then – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a local magazine that appears to lack sufficient notability.'''
 * '''A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drm310 (talk) 05:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Jonmackenzie -- I have declined this proposed deletion on grounds that you object to it. (Note in future, for the proposed deletion process, you can object simply by removing the proposed deletion tag.) However, I am not certain that the article meets Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion. Generally these are met by citing multiple instances of independent coverage in depth from reliable sources, such as books or national newspapers. A quick Google search failed to find anything appropriate. If you know of such coverage, for example in tourist guides to the islands, I suggest that you add reference to it.
 * If you want help in understanding the deletion processes or establishing notabiity for articles, a good place to try is the Teahouse. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 22:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)