User talk:Jonny2003 05 26

October 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Varāhamihira—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 04:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC)


 * See matrialscientist I provided the explanation with citation of why Varahmir is possibly lived in 1st century BCE as stated in various INDIAN sources and in what ways is not Constructive criticism if you speaking truth hurts you ??
 * ALSO their is a citation for HINDU Scripture being Forgery but I am also providing citation that Colonial British people also did forgery !!
 * " However if really one looks close one can resolve the apprent contradictions by taking 1st SHAKA SAMVAT around 551 BCE and 2nd Shaka Samvat from 78 CE as Suggested by HINDU Traditional viewpoint which is ellaborated by Pandit Kota Venkatachalam. . As for forgery in ancient HINDU Scriptures it should be noted that it was a practice British Colonial mind set to force changes in published versions of texts as evident from comparing manuscripts especially regarding years in books like Panch Siddantikas
 * This was my text and its well cited and you know what even on Shaka Samvat page of Wikipedia its written disputed because the tradition of INDIA holds 2 Shaka Samvats based on Matsya PURAN chapter 273 while historians only consider 1. Jonny2003 05 26 (talk) 04:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I mean that's traditional point of view like Kota Venkatachalam used to be 1 of 4 Shankaracharyas (head of smarta sect of hinduism) Jonny2003 05 26 (talk) 20:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I mean that's traditional point of view like Kota Venkatachalam used to be 1 of 4 Shankaracharyas (head of smarta sect of hinduism) Jonny2003 05 26 (talk) 20:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:RS, WP:FRINGE and WP:NOR. M L Raja is director of AVINASH, and therefore, his work is a self-published book, not peer-reviewed by other scholars. Not to mention that according to the book itself, the author is an "Eye Specialist", not a qualified historian. Same goes for Kota Venkatachalam: his book describes him as the "Author and Publisher". utcursch &#124; talk 17:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)