User talk:Jonny Tightchest/sandbox

Himani's peer review
Great start in identifying important aspects that should be changed in the Albite article, primarily the structure, with the addition of headings. There is quite a bit of information which is repeated (ex. mineral properties) so when separating the currently written information, I would suggest caution in making sure there is still a lead with key details and expanding further (as you have already began drafting in your sandbox) within the headings. The properties section may follow the same structure as other mineral pages, with only key points on right side below first image (as already seen) and more information in another heading. If the proposed eytmology section is short in comparison to other sections, it may be worth adding in its discovery history alongside. So far, the article remains relatively neutral. In terms of reliable sources, I would recommend using more peer-reviewed journal articles, some which may even be listed in the websites you have already noted. Using databases can also help in researching current and ongoing research on applications of the mineral. I like your idea in adding more poetic terms. HD1019 (talk) 16:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Himani, for your peer review. I appreciate that much of what you've read from my ideas seems agreeable to you, and will take heed of your suggestion regarding sources. Certainly, my use of library resources is rare and I probably would benefit from being more creative in where my sources are found. I wouldn't say that 'albeit' is in itself a poetic term, but if you're simply suggesting that you enjoy some colour in what you read, than I'll bite.Jonny Tightchest (talk) 02:01, 12 March 2019 (UTC)