User talk:Jonnyegan

Regarding your edits to Casey Stengel:
Your recent edit to Casey Stengel (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user editing a page that experiences malicious edits by banned users that continue to edit via shared IP ranges or open proxies. Since these ranges are too large (collateral damage) to be blocked and user's IP addresses are not visible, edits to this page by logged-out editors of server or shared IP ranges and new users are reverted. The changes can be reviewed and restored by established users. // VoABot II 17:41, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Midway
You are adding very biased edits to the page. Your point-of-view style would work in a book but not an encyclopedia. Please keep it neutral and informative. Binksternet 05:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Everything is opinion. There is no neutality. What you are asking for is a 'standard" or ordinary interpretation of events, like in a high school text book. It may be neutral but is it true? Yamamoto left his carriers alone to be plucked off by an outnumbered fleet. What worked at Pearl Harbor, and Nagumo's carriers had the same protetcion at Midway as at Pearl, didn't work at Midway. Those carriers should have had the whole fleet around them. I was reading the Wikipedia sections on Darwin and they all support the standard paradigm, which is a point of view. I don't know of any encyclopedia that doesn't have a point of view. You want the point of view to be essentially the same as yours, and if it isn't, then it is 'bias.' What's being said here? That Yamamoto was an abject failure? He began the war with the world's best fleet. Three years later it lay at the bottom of the ocean. There's never been a naval disaster like it. We should be neutral about this guy?