User talk:Jonnyoxley

May 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oxley, Queensland. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 11:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Oxley, Queensland
Why would the ordering of suburbs listed in any one direction and for that matter, the inclusion of Inala in the first place, be so important to you? You could argue that the suburb or locality with the longest boundary be placed first but I haven't seen that used elsewhere and its not practical to make measurements. I've used from left to right (west to east) and top to bottom (north to south) in the past because that section of the infobox is about direction and its seemed to be the most logical ordering. - Shiftchange (talk) 02:34, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * You have to face the fact that the intersection of Boundary Road and Kimberley Street marks the corner points of four suburbs. These are Oxley to north east, Inala to the south east, Richlands to the south west and Darra to the north west.  Until this fact changes the infobox must also represent that fact.  Anything else would be a misrepresentation, despite your claims of accuracy.  In all directions these boundaries continue as such for at least a kilometre, so its not some minor conjunction. - Shiftchange (talk) 02:34, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Oxley, Queensland. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 11:23, 31 May 2015 (UTC)