User talk:Joolio12

Notability of Gwendolyn Zepeda
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gwendolyn Zepeda, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gwendolyn Zepeda seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gwendolyn Zepeda, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 00:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted for not asserting notability. Simply being a blogger isn't an assertion of notability according to the guidelines on notability. --Core desat 20:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * While the first source is questionable according to the reliable source guidelines, I'm convinced by the rest that this is not a speedily deletable article. Consider it restored. However, it might possibly be sent to WP:AFD in the future if someone else isn't as convinced of her notability. You should make sure the sources are in the article if they're not already. --Core desat 01:41, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Reference
No, the copyright doesn't matter as you are just using it as a reference. However, you can't copy the source directly, as that would be a copyright violation. --Core desat 06:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC)