User talk:Joopercoopers/Archive 5

Professionalism
I've never attempted professionalism, that way I can't fail! Fair point well made (highly trafficked) though so I removed.  raseaC talk to me 11:29, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Talk:2010 Northumbria Police manhunt
Hi Joopercoopers. I have now amended 2010 Northumbria Police manhunt to leave out the name of Moat's daughter, while leaving the actual content in tact. You may want to have a look at how I've worded it. If you are happy with it, would you object to rephrasing your comment on the Talk page to omit her name also (it's not much use protecting her privacy in the article if we then name her on the Talk page!). Skinsmoke (talk) 10:22, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

St Mary Redcliffe
Hi, if you wish to discuss the agreed consensus about Bristol articles, please join this thread. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 13:03, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Rathband
Hi

I noticed your request for clarification on uso of the pre treatment images. Did you manage to get anywhere with that ?

I was a bit surprised to see that they mention "on the basis the media respect the express wishes of his family not to be approached or identified." as the first I knew of the incident was a three page spread in The Sun (I think) the day before yesterday where he was clearly identified and talking about the experience. Also the comments on the media copyright page do not seem to fully understand the situation "to help catch the perp" as he was already dead.

One thing I would say is that the after treatment injuries look a lot less damaging than I thought they would, especially after seeing those pics just now. It is a shame he was blinded though and is truly shocking that a man can go to those legnths just because he felt "a woman getting done for no car tax" was unjust - doesn't really make sense when compared to "shoots man in face because he was doing his job".

I am interested to see how that all plays out - did the tazer shotgun shell cause him to pull the trigger due to convulsion from the shock etc. Chaosdruid (talk) 06:57, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

WP Architecture in the Signpost
"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Architecture for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 06:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom Election RFC courtesy notice
A request for comment that may interest you is currently in progress at Requests for comment/2010 ArbCom election voting procedure. If you have already participated, then please disregard this notice and my apologies. A Horse called Man 18:52, 25 October 2010 (UTC)  You received this message because you participated in the earlier ArbCom voting system RFC.

Deconstructivism FAR
nominated Deconstructivism for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --Elekhh (talk) 01:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: functionaries
It was a very long time ago and I don't remember exactly. All I remember is that the case was a complete mess, even more so than usual. --ScWizard (talk) 06:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Article Tahash Timeline
Please look at the article Tahash, and on the Discussion Page: "Consensus on Timeline" give your opinion about the Timeline. Thank you. --Michael Paul Heart (talk) 12:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Deconstructivism FAR
Hi Joopercoopers - The Deconstructivism FAR (review page at WP:Featured article review/Deconstructivism/archive1) has been moved to the FARC section, where keep/delist votes are made. If you have the time, could you please return to the review page to give your opinion on whether the article should be kept or delisted? Thank you, Dana boomer (talk) 20:13, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Architect Origins
I think you'll find my addition to Architect was copied primarily from Civil Engineering, and this is infact a copy of the WP article. So your suggestion of CopyVio is incorrect. Nonetheless, I've modified the wording and, for what it's worth, I've referenced the violator. Cheers, Homo architectus (talk) 17:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Good article help desk
I am working on a kind of help desk for good articles (Sandboxed here) and have linked to your userspace article on reviewing good articles. Let me know if you don't want it linked and I will remove it. Thanks AIR corn (talk) 05:41, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Credo Reference
I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.

We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi 19:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Little Moreton Hall
I decided I wanted to create an article on the custom of concealing shoes in the structure of buildings, but I didn't want it to be an orphan, so in preparation I looked around for existing articles that might reasonably link to it. I pretty quickly came across There Was an Old Woman Who Lived in a Shoe, which I've expanded a bit, but then much more interestingly I came across Little Moreton Hall, in the structure of which 18 assorted boots and shoes were discovered during the last major restoration in 1992. I got a little caught up in the article itself, so I moved a few bits around so that it made more sense to me; I think if it's tightened up and the sourcing is improved it could make quite a nice little article.

What I came to ask you about, as one of the major contributors to the article, is whether you have any objections to my addition of that new Superstition and haunting section. It's only a single sentence right now, but barring objections I intend to expand it. What do you think? George Ponderevo (talk) 21:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)


 * How interesting - I had no idea about shoes. As to being a major contributor to that article, I think my input was pretty minor really - perhaps you should approach the redoubtable Malleus Fatuorom as I'm sure he had more a hand in it than I. Lovely, salt of the earth sort of wikipedian, just requires the sort of kindly courtesy you have shown me here. As to the witchcraft - well I have personal views that lean towards the 'it's all hokum' camp, and as such, any source is unlikely to be considered reliable; but then I suppose the addition might add a little flavour if kept proportionately short - are the ghosts famous in the 'wiv er 'ed tucked underneef er arm, she waaaalks the blady tower' kind of victorian music hall fame (ie. notable) or are they more the 'chambermaids have often said they felt a bit funny when asked to accompany the butler to the cellar' kind? Best of luck. --Joopercoopers (talk) 01:51, 30 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I came across Malleus while doing a bit on The Coral Island, which I see he's now taken to GA. I've gone ahead and expanded that new Superstition and haunting section, and I'm quite sure that if MF disapproves he won't be shy in letting me know, although with his own interest in the bizarre and the occult I doubt he'll have a problem. I've also ordered a couple of books on Little Moreton Hall, so maybe in a few weeks that might also be worthy of a GA nomination. George Ponderevo (talk) 00:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Batu grottoes
Hi !

I see that you have been translating "Höhlentempel in Asien". I just tried to move the picture Batu-Höhlen Eingang.jpg onto Commons, so that it appears now on your translation. I have had some problems with the license, so if you are familiar with this question, please have a look at it, otherwise it may be deleted. I am doing the same translation into french. I had also troubles with the tables, which I see you didn't treat properly. You can get some inspiration from the present version I am working on : Trassiorf/Sandbox. In particular I have introduced some ordering for the dates of conception, and for the empty country labels. Nevertheless, the template is perhaps specifically french, and there must be some equivalent sorting template in english.

Trassiorf (talk) 12:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Beeston2.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Beeston2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Credo
Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Much obliged. --Joopercoopers (talk) 20:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)