User talk:Jopug

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Monarchy of the United Kingdom has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Avoided (talk) 14:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mr. T, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Powerade, you may be blocked from editing. Rodhull andemu  20:12, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to You Suck: A Love Story, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: You Suck: A Love Story was changed by Jopug (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881928 on 2011-03-02T05:16:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Noah ratcliff, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Psilocybin mushroom, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. bonadea contributions talk 15:57, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Prolog (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Per your email request, I have unblocked this account. Please be aware that any further vandalism will result in a block without a warning. Prolog (talk) 20:27, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Elizabeth II, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Elizabeth II was changed by Jopug (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851105 on 2011-10-17T18:37:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:37, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Prolog (talk) 18:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Further inappropriate unblock appeals will result in the loss of your ability to edit this page, and will seriously compromise any future chances of being unblocked. (Context) Hers fold  non-admin (t/a/c) 20:01, 4 December 2012 (UTC)