User talk:Jordan0027

Welcome!

 * }

July 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Exhall Grange School has been reverted. Your edit here to Exhall Grange School was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/pages/Exhall-Grange-School-Science-Collage/544750425553448) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to User:Paul MacDermott because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message here. (I've added your talk page to my watchlist.) Thanks! —C.Fred (talk) 20:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Exhall Grange School with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:16, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, Jordan0027. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Exhall Grange School, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Exhall Grange School with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 20:21, 4 July 2013 (UTC)