User talk:Jordan Mitchell Barrett

Your submission at Articles for creation: Structural Ramsey theory has been accepted
 Structural Ramsey theory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 12:25, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Structural_Ramsey_theory help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: KPT correspondence (November 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KPT correspondence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:KPT correspondence, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:KPT_correspondence Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:KPT_correspondence reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 14:53, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Puntuation and mathematical notation
Please see my recent edits to Structural Ramsey theory.
 * right: Kechris–Pestov–Todorčević correspondence
 * wrong: Kechris-Pestov-Todorčević correspondence
 * right: Nešetřil–Rödl theorem
 * wrong: Nešetřil-Rödl theorem

This sort of usage requires an en-dash rather than a hyphen. Also, notice some differences below:

\begin{align} & \mathrm{codom} f \\ & \operatorname{codom} f \\ & \operatorname{codom}(f) \end{align} $$ These are respectively coded as:
 * \mathrm{codom} f
 * \operatorname{codom} f
 * \operatorname{codom}(f)

The first one lacks proper spacing. When \operatorname{} is used, the spacing to the left and right is right. Notice the difference between the second and third items above: There is less space after "codom" in the second one than in the first. With \operatorname{} the spacing depends on context; with \mathrm{} it does not. The spacing conventions built in to the software are those appropriate for mathematical notation. That and some other differences that can be seen in some contexts are why \operatorname{} is the proper usage here. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:59, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks - will keep this in mind going forward. --Jordan Mitchell Barrett (talk) 20:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Fraïssé limit has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fraïssé limit. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 10:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fraïssé limit (January 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fraïssé limit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fraïssé limit, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fra%C3%AFss%C3%A9_limit Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fra%C3%AFss%C3%A9_limit reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fraïssé limit has been accepted
 Fraïssé limit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Fra%C3%AFss%C3%A9_limit help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for February 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rod Downey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rutherford Medal ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Rod_Downey check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Rod_Downey?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay
Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics.  Schwede 66  09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)