User talk:Jordanna.Nolan

154–173 -

Careful with dashes and comments
Hi there, and welcome. Please see Talk:List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience. It took me more than an hour to repair the damage that you made with this edit. Please be very careful with minus signs, dashes and comments. Crippling a comment closure ( "-->" ) by replacing a minus sign with a dash, hides everything down to and including the next properly closed comment ( " ). - DVdm (talk) 13:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Please preview first, see your change to reference 4 at List of topics characterized as pseudoscience
I doubt that you intended to add an error there, but you did. Doug Weller talk 14:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)


 * I have added the required url: . See also the preceding section. - DVdm (talk) 14:40, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Doug Weller  talk 14:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm DVdm. An edit that you recently made to List of topics characterized as pseudoscience seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DVdm (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)