User talk:Jordanramsay/sandbox

In an interview, subcommittee chairman Rep. Brad Miller pledged to investigate scientific integrity concerns under the Bush Administration. Miller noted that there were multiple reports in the media of the Bush Administration's manipulation of science to advance his political agenda, corrupt advisory panels, and minimize scientific research with federal funds. Miller, as part of the House Committee of Science and Technology, collected evidence of interference with scientific integrity by Bush's political appointees. [59] Jordanramsay (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

ENVIRONMENTAL PART: In a study, "The legitimacy of environmental scientists in the public sphere" by Gordon Gauchat, Timothy O’Brien, and Oriol Mirosa, the researchers conclude that attitudes about environmental scientists as policy advisers are highly politicized. Their results demonstrate that, to be perceived by the public as a reputable policy advisor, the public's perception of their integrity and understanding weigh more strongly than their agreement with scientific consensus. Jordanramsay (talk) 16:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Try to add more sources and keep the tone of your article less persuasive and more neutral, whereby you are simply laying out facts. Its a little short so you might want to get another source and add some more. other than that it looks good! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kragw (talk • contribs) 16:39, 19 April 2018 (UTC)