User talk:Jordanviv02/Hummingbird/Cbutl37 Peer Review

Your name: Casey Butler (Cbutl37) Reviewee: Jordanviv02 Article you are reviewing: Hummingbird

1. I like the clarification of the word syrinx and other terms like tympanum and so on as most reader would not know what that is.

2. The last sentences seems like a run-on sentence. The author may way to split this sentence up to make sure it makes sense to the reader. Instead of continuously saying which..., which... you may want to just break this section off in a clear more concise sentence.

3. The author just needs to be more concise when giving the most detailed information especially in the last sentence as it is the most confusing. That sentence has the most confusing information and therefore needs to not be structured so it makes it harder for the reader to understand.

4. I pointed out the clarification in the first sentence as this is something I am missing in my article. I need to define terms that are not familiar to the reader.

5. The sentences are set in a very sensible order as each sentence builds on the pervious one.

6. The length seems fine. This article is not off topic so no info needs to be deleted but just reworded possibly. If anything, another sentence would do the article justice.

7. The article appears neutral and does not draw any unnecessary conclusions.

8. There are no biased phrases in this article.

9. All statements have a citation at the end showing its connection to the reliable journals in the reference section.

10. All statements are balanced between two sources showing a balanced article. There is not single point of view.

11. No statements are unsourced with accurate information.