User talk:Jordanwaring

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I appreciate your contributions to Fred Waring. I assume he is your grandfather? Thanks, GChriss &lt;always listening&gt; &lt;c&gt; 02:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Your autobiography
I see you've posted your autobiography. This is considered highly problematical in the Wikipedia community. As you have perhaps discovered, the pillars of Wikipedia include verifiability and a neutral point of view. Quite simply, it's awfully difficult to be neutral when you're writing about yourself. The entire Jordan Waring article is unsourced, making it unverifiable by anyone but you. For more information, see WP:VANITY and WP:AUTO. Marc Shepherd 21:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Jordan Waring
Your recent edit to Jordan Waring (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi Marc, I am having difficutly figuring out how to enter the sources. I type tag. Mango juice talk 15:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Jordan Waring
Hey -- just a note, but you need to realize that admins don't step in and solve editing disputes. Also, while editing an article on yourself isn't forbidden, you have to realize that if you are going to edit your own article, you have to be just another editor and keep on equal footing with the others: you can't use your status as the actual subject to try to force things to go any particular way. Keep in mind that no one "owns" wikipedia articles, especially not their subjects. Also, it's important to not provide only one side of the story when you know both: you said that we are welcome to add any negative reviews we can find. Admittedly, I didn't find any on a simple websearch, at least not from reputable sources. But since you're the subject you should know: are you saying you've never had a negative review? If you know of negative reviews and are only providing the positive ones, that is pushing a WP:POV and exactly what WP:VANITY exists for. Mango juice talk 15:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi Mango, I am not saying that I know of negative reviews, I don´t. All I am saying is that I´m willing to concede they exist. I know when the record company put out my CD, they sent it around to many different radio stations and publications. Perhaps one or many of them gave it bad reviews, but I don´t know of any. All I am saying is that if they exist, great, lets mention that. I´m trying to keep this NPOV as much as possible, and I think that the article has been whittled down to, as they used to say in dragnet, "just the facts"
 * Hello, Mr. Waring.
 * Just a suggestion: Since you are obviously a knowledgeable musician and a good writer, why not edit some other articles in Wikipedia on topics that interest you.  By editing articles other than yourself and your family, you will gain experience in editing Wikipedia and dealing with the collaborative process on articles where you have more objectivity and neutrality.  This would, of course, be helpful to Wikipedia and also, I think, give you some more perspective on what we are all doing here.  Best wishes.  -- Ssilvers 17:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Jordan -- that's a good answer. No offense, but you probably aren't well-known enough to get much in the way of bad reviews: if someone didn't like it, they probably wouldn't write about it. :)  Mango juice talk 14:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Good point Mango, you actually made me laugh with that one :). You´re right, and of course, no offense taken. Jordanwaring 15:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Imagen 009.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Imagen 009.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 09:07, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fredrick Malcolm Waring, Jr.
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fredrick Malcolm Waring, Jr., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * BLP unsourced for more than 2 years.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mr.Z-man 21:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fredrick Malcolm Waring, Jr.
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fredrick Malcolm Waring, Jr., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unsourced biography of a living person

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. AndrewRT(Talk) 21:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Fredrick Malcolm Waring Jr. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fredrick Malcolm Waring Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fredrick Malcolm Waring Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:18, 16 December 2017 (UTC)