User talk:JordiHUBC

Welcome
Greetings... Hello, JordiHUBC, and  welcome to Wikipedia! 
 * To get started, click on the green welcome.
 * I hope you like it here and decide to stay! Happy editing! jbmurray (talk • contribs) 19:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Bibliography assignment
--jbmurray (talk • contribs) 23:04, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Magical Realism Reconsidered
I'm looking forward to working with your class during the semester - if you have any questions about the project or Wikipedia in general, please feel free to leave me a note at User talk:Awadewit. Wikipedians are here to help you! Awadewit (talk) 23:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

new group
JordiHUBC, I've now moved you from the Magic realism group to the one working on Alejo Carpentier. The former was too full, and that latter needed more people. Please work on the bibliography assignment accordingly. Thanks. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 10:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

good job and word of advice
JordiHUBC, first to say good job on getting going on the assignment and leaving a note on Katie322's page.

But second just to point out that you accidentally deleted my earlier note on that page. If you look here you can see what happened: compare what's on the left there with what's on the right; you've accidentally written over my earlier text.

In this case, it's not a big deal at all (my message was totally banal), and as always on Wikipedia any mistake can be undone--and in fact I've undone it. But this is just a piece of advice to take care; in other cases, you might get rid of something that's not so unimportant.

Though once more: the more you try it out, the easier it gets, and in the end there's no mistake that can't be fixed. Good luck! --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 23:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Notes about bibliography
Hey Jordi! I started our official bibliography on the Alejo Carpentier talk page. The sources are in alphabetical order for easy reference and I added a description of how the source might best help our article (ie: sections like 'music', 'style', etc...) in brackets after each source, if you want to do the same (makes it easy to remember what every source is about). I have to go home to look at more books before I add to the shortlist, but please add many more references and add the best ones to the short list before tomorrow. Thanks! Katie322 (talk) 02:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Jordi, I got your message, but I'm a little confused. You put the 7-8 sources on our article's TALK page, right? Chances are that all of the sources are now jumbling together in my mind, haha, but I couldn't see your new ones there. Also, be sure to add a few sources to our shortlist. Josie and I are the only ones who have done that so far and we need some more group input :) Thanks!  Katie322 (talk) 15:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I see what happened. Your sources went onto the actual article page in the Further Reading section (which is good because the should eventually be there anyways). I've copied them over to the DISCUSSION page (just because they are due today) and added a few to the shortlist (please feel free to add more to the shortlist as I have just added the minimum needed). Also, if you still have the reference information on the sources you found, could you add volume/no./pages/etc. to the articles? If you don't have it, no worries; I'm sure we can find them easy enough. Katie322 (talk) 16:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Nuclear Warfare's comments
Hey Jordi, Check out our article's discussion page. Nuclear Warfare has left some very helpful hints for us regarding cleaning up the article :) Katie322 (talk) 15:29, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

GA nomination, photo, and Hanne
Hey-o! I just nominated our article for GA status and also asked Nuclear Warfare if he/she wouldn't mind reviewing it. We should still keep workin on it, especially minor edits such as grammar. As for the photo, I asked Ettrig, Jon, and NW what they thought of the situation, but so far there have been no replies, so I guess we'll just hold tight on that one. On a side note, Hanne told me last night that she has been editing, but for some reason it is not showing up in the history of the article. She has emailed Jon about this to see what to do. If you do your peer review before we hear why this is happening, then maybe just make a note of it or mention it in your review of Hanne. I have no idea why something like that would happen. Buena suerte, amigo! Katie322 (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

No go on GA, but...
Check the discussion page, we didn't get the GA status. The reviewer gave us some good feedback though and we may be able to resubmit by Tuesday. Hope all is well!--Josiemitchell (talk) 21:53, 17 April 2010 (UTC)