User talk:Jordi Burguet Castell

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

And thank you for your changes to numerical integration. Oleg Alexandrov 00:24, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Editing templates
Hi jbc. If you look at the wikisource of the page you'll have seen. This just means it takes the contents of Template:EU Constitution and pastes them into the page, so it can be changed across a whole series of pages in one go. If you put "Template:" in front of any of these you will get to the actual template you can edit as normal. Hope I have explained this okay. &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 23:41, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Linux and GNU/Linux
There is no consensus for this change, in fact the consensus is against it. Also, the way you tried to carry it out (as a cut-and-paste "move" rather than a proper page move) is invalid in itself, because it loses all the page history. -- Curps 01:10, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

If you actually wish to propose this change, you should go to Requested moves and propose the change there (with a discussion and vote) rather than unilaterally trying to make this change against consensus. -- Curps 01:12, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Current real-world usage uses "Linux" to refer to the operating system and "Linux kernel" to refer to the kernel. Note there is already a disambiguation page at Linux (disambiguation). Despite RMS's wishes, "GNU/Linux" never caught on and is only used by a minority of the Linux-using community (eg, Debian) and mostly not at all by the media. I believe that if you call for a discussion and vote at Requested moves you will find that the consensus here reflects this real-world usage. -- Curps 01:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Arecibo message binary numbers.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Arecibo message binary numbers.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Arecibo_message_deoxyribose.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Arecibo_message_deoxyribose.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kelly hi! 16:17, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Repost of TuxGuitar
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 19:56, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gdbserver


The article Gdbserver has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * non-notable and written like a how to.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ridernyc (talk) 23:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I removed the  notice, I don't think it is non-notable. As for lacking references, I think that is a reason to improve it, not to delete it. --jbc (talk) 12:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Rotational delay
An article that you have been involved in editing, Rotational delay, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. &sect; Music Sorter &sect;  (talk) 07:58, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pillar of Champagne


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pillar of Champagne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Animalparty! (talk) 07:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Katex.png
Thank you for uploading File:Katex.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phaser (game framework)


The article Phaser (game framework) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The1337gamer (talk) 16:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

If those are the standards for proposed deletion, I believe they err too much on the stifling side. It seems more appropriate to mark such an article as needing more work or whatever, more than say it's gonna be deleted. A little appreciation for the work and concern of the editor? :) --jbc (talk) 23:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Phaser (game framework) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Phaser (game framework), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the directions on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. czar 23:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Phaser (game framework) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phaser (game framework) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Phaser (game framework) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of KaTeX for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KaTeX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/KaTeX until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  15:52, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Jump to navigation Jump to search The page Peer Community in already existed as draft under review
Hello Jordi. I left a message on the talk page of Peer_Community_in, to point out what the section title says. It's unfortunate that you had to re-translate it. Anyway, I wrote on the talk page of the last reviewer for the English draft about this coordination issue, and he seemed positive about the fact that the current page that you create is there to stay. Natematic (talk) 09:26, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of PupaSuite


The article PupaSuite has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "previously tagged for no sources, notability. Tool appears no longer available"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amkilpatrick (talk) 11:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)