User talk:Jorgen W

Hello, welcome guests. --Jörgen W 03:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Suggestbot archived messages

Fixing the Science article to reflect all fields using the scientific method, including the social sciences
I saw in the discussion that you intended to get to this. Just wondering if you are expecting to be able to do it, as I don't think I can. Shoreranger (talk) 17:15, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

jdavie
I agree with your assessment, although possibly a block is more appropriate than a ban; but Kuru got your message first. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikibooks
I am planning to build a Wikibook on linear algebra; the work is still in progress, anyone wanting to collaborate is welcome to join. Jorgen W (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Help
So, I have some very basic questions: why all users and contributors are used to write "per" instead of "for"? The most recurring example: a user explains her/his edit, or posts a comment in a debating discussion and writes per WP:Policy instead of for WP:Policy; also the abuse of words and paraphrases borrowed from Latin or Italian sound unappropriate (for example,the term Consensus used instead of Agreement, the misuse of "de facto", just to mention one, the list is longer); is it American or some kind of pidgin English?? Or just "nerdie" English? --Jorgen W (talk) 20:32, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I think, at this point, it's just "Wikipedia [Non-]Standard English". --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @  20:33, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your quick reply, it doesn't change my bad opinion, though.--Jorgen W (talk) 10:12, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Due to those issues, becoming a glad and co-operative contributor is nearly impossible to me, therefore I'm in a sort of semi-retirement.Jorg (talk) 02:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)