User talk:Jorgowiki

AfC notification: Draft:Building blocks (toy) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Building blocks (toy). Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 19:23, 19 January 2022 (UTC) :Thank you for your comment. I solved it by using "blockquote" because, when I just rewrite the same text, then I can directly go for the quote. What do you think? Jorgowiki (talk) 14:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

It would be better to rewrite it in your own words, Wikipedia generally discouraged long quotation unless the phrasing itself is important or otherwise not imitable, but that's not very long and doesn't have any copyright issues, which is the important part. Rusalkii (talk) 15:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC) ::Got it. I will modify and come back to you. Jorgowiki (talk) 15:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Building blocks (toy) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Building blocks (toy). Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:59, 19 January 2022 (UTC) Jorgowiki (talk) 15:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your comment. Please excuse that I don't speak native English, thus may interpret technical terms differently. I agree that "building blocks" belong under the construction set category. Due to the community and market size of building blocks in the field of "Educational Toys" and hopefully growing input to this initial Wikipedia article in future, I hope and wish that the volume of the article will grow. Thus, I would appreciate a link with a small summary from construction set to a separat "Building blocks" will give, which I will be happy to take care of. In this respect, I am with a complete "merge" so "the merge" not quite as happy as an additionally beautiful wrapped forwarding link. Consequently I saw the necessity to build-up this article firstly, secondary insertion of some helpful links in the page you proposed and maybe some others too.
 * Usually the way to do this is to expand the original article first, and then when it has become too long, propose WP:SPLITTING the article. This is better because it avoids there being two articles on the same subject. I suggest you leave a message at Talk:Construction set and maybe Talk:Lego making editors of those articles aware of your draft, and hopefully you can come to a consensus as to what should be done. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Building blocks (toy) has been accepted
 Building blocks (toy), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Building_blocks_(toy) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 15:59, 25 February 2022 (UTC)