User talk:Jorisgoud

Notability of Bika LIMS
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bika LIMS, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bika LIMS is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bika LIMS, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

FYI Conflict of interest guideline
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. — Athaenara ✉  14:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Notability requirements for articles
Hi Joris, please review WP:N to see what requirements are for inclusion in wikipedia. Your article as written had no indication that the website was notable, so I deleted your article. Notability is generally determined by substantial coverage in independent, third-party publications. If your website has received substantial media coverage or has won awards, you may rewrite the article and cite these sources. It might be a good idea to draft your article in userspace (for example, here) and then contact a wikipedian (either me, or you can ask at the helpdesk for attention) to have them make sure it meets our requirements before going live. Please also read WP:COI, as noted above, which discusses conflicts of interest. Thanks for your contributions and we hope that you can stay to contribute to the encyclopedia! Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * For instance, Plone (software) is (probably) notable because many independent tech sites covered its launch etc. I speedy-deleted Core LIMS (software) because it was clearly not notable. I proposed LabSoft LIMS for deletion, and it will be deleted in five days if no one objects. I'm also in the process of putting EQMS::LIMS up for a deletion debate. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)