User talk:Jornkonijn

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Risselada (May 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Risselada and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Max Risselada, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Max_Risselada Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Max_Risselada reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Max Risselada has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission,:
 * The relevant standard is not whether there are third party sources to meet GNG. The relevant standard is WP:PROF., and that is normally met by showing the person to be influential in their subject as demonstrated by citations to their work. I think the subject is notable. The problem is that there are many judgements of quality that are unsourced entirely. The straight biographical facts an be sourced from a person's official CV, but not anything involving evaluation. Please take a look at every single adjective. Almost all of them are not just unsourced, but unnecessary.   When ready for another review, let me know on my user talk page.

. Thanks!  DGG ( talk ) 04:20, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Max Risselada


Hello, Jornkonijn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Max Risselada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  04:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)