User talk:JoseCuerpo

August 2023
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 22:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC)


 *  Intriguing. Patient responds with condescension and appears to soothe an inferiority complex by asserting control over a world separate from their own life. Projection of inner-resentment may suggest a disposition that wells from an emotional callous. The stirrings of psychological pathology evident. Further examination necessary. 
 * Please humor me, sir. Imagine you have stood on the precipice of greatness, but then find yourself suddenly crippled and entirely impotent. From your squalor, you are presented with the opportunity to become a living god. It would only require that you sacrifice all of the people you have ever cared for. You know better than all the rulers and jesters in disguise. You could make the world a better place. Could you make this decision?
 *  Patient easily antagonized. Primary response frustration. Patient will enforce a belief that the thought experiment is beneath them. However; this will not satisfy. They know the only way to prove themselves above any antagonism is to deny their own assertion of control. Patient will demonstrate they value victory over growth. They will not revert the published information and withdraw. Patient will refuse to admit inadequacy within a domain where they are meant to be strong. Recommend referral to counseling.  JoseCuerpo (talk) 19:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)