User talk:Jose Carlton

Welcome

 * }

Edit Summaries
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. —  Spike Toronto  19:59, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Silvio Pollio worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Silvio Pollio. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:27, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Silvio Pollio. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Tide  rolls  23:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Silvio Pollio
Stop edit warring on this article. If you have concerns regarding article content or ideas on article improvement, please engage other editors on the article's talk page. Your edits are damaging the article's format. Regards  Tide  rolls  23:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Silvio Pollio. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bluebadger1 (talk) 16:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Further vandalism will result in your account and similar editors being reported to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement.Bluebadger1 (talk) 16:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

The information you are adding is poorly sourced, highly promotional, and not cited or referenced. Please provide references and verifiable information for your edits or additions. Bluebadger1 (talk) 16:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)


 * More to the point, it looks like you're deleting properly sourced material. Wikipedia articles contain both good and bad information on subjects. If you think there is a problem with the information, please explain your concerns at Talk:Silvio Pollio. Removing the text without explanation is disruptive and may lead to your account being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 16:25, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Silvio_Pollio&oldid=390906630 = Obvious page blanking and vandalism after significant improvement and references added to article, as well was warning from other users. Suggest reporting user to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement for ban/block. Will restore/undo vandalism, but do not want to encourage edit war. Suggestions? Bluebadger1 (talk) 17:00, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at Silvio Pollio. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 17:43, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Blocks and Bans
"This account or IP address is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference: 17:43, 15 October 2010 Favonian (talk | contribs) blocked Jose Carlton (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 24 hours ‎ (Edit warring)" Bluebadger1 (talk) 17:46, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Conflict on interest
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Silvio Pollio, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 01:45, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Also, the Silvio Pollio article is currently WP:Protection policy; you will need to request changes be made on the talk page rather than editing the page yourself. —C.Fred (talk) 01:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Shouldn't this account be blocked for socking? Or is only the second account blocked? Bluebadger1 (talk) 08:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * A party is allowed one account. So long as they wish to edit constructively, they may edit with that one account. If a party creates multiple accounts, the extra accounts will be blocked indefinitely; the first account may or may not be blocked, depending on how the multiple accounts were being used. —C.Fred (talk) 14:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC)