User talk:JosebaAbaitua/sandbox/References/DHum2021/SEOANE SAN ROMÁN, Aitor

Each of them has pros and cons, and, as Alexander Yemmets suggests, there is no point in adhering to one of those strategies since combining some of them would help  much more in the task of achieving a successful translation. However, that is not a usual practice due to all the previous learning needed to master only one of  those strategies, let alone more than one. Scholars with a long experience in the field, such as Francis R. Jones join that statement arguing that “the sets of imperiously  needed skills and previous knowledge to, not even translate, but only rewrite a poem are  numerous and highly complex.

Other scholars, such as Seamus Heaney ;and Andrea Kenesei ; contribute to the discussion locating themselves against interpretative translation because they think it is just the choice of an idle translator. Although it might sound great in a translator’s mind, that type of translations change all the meaning of the poem and highly influence the views of future readers.