User talk:Josef J. Jarosch

Welcome!
Hello, Josef J. Jarosch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk)  14:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The article contains a section NEW DEVELOPMENTS. I have added two recent publications (Rose, Norbruis, with Norbruis being the best I have ever read on the issue, a Leiden PhD thesis controlled, supported and rightly accepted by some of the most prominent members of our discipline, Kloekhorst, Kümmel, Melchert and others). I quoted Norbruis's abstract in the section NEW DEVELOPMENTS, and I know that Jasanoff-2003 refutes SIX other theories and not only THREE. I am quite aghast that NEW DEVELOPMENTS, i.e. more recent publications, must not find a place or mentioning in the English Wikipedia; the German one is not THAT BAD and "BEHIND". By the way, the notation of PIE to know is either wóydh2e or uóidh2e and not a mixture of both. Very sincerely yours Josef J. Jarosch. Josef J. Jarosch (talk) 14:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)