User talk:Josefhoracek

Welcome!

Hello, Josefhoracek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —Ruud 19:27, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Nice work!
Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Josef Horáček (talk) 22:55, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * How nice! I like me some cookies. Josef Horáček (talk) 03:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

I decided to change my article to History of the Grand Canyon area. Does that look like a better article than my previous article, Association of the United States Army? Emilymerkel3 (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's an excellent choice. Josef Horáček (talk) 23:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

I changed my article to the 1988 Summer Olympics and found all of my sources. The information in the section of the article I am trying to incorporate sources into is all accurate however, the section does not cite any sources at all. Should I just cite the information written or rewrite the information and then cite it. The information once again is accurate there are just simply no citations to prove it, but according to my sources the information is highly accurate. If you could let me know what I should do I would really appreciate it. Thank you! Jwood57 (talk) 01:16, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * You can just add the sources to the information as it is written. Josef Horáček (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

I am doing my lead on Sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs. I was wondering whether or not I should include a couple specific examples from the section of researched examples mentioned later on in the article, or should I just include the concepts and basic ideas about the topic? Thank You! Hdesro1 (talk) 04:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Given that all the examples are rather speculative, it's probably not a good idea to highlight any of them in the lead. Instead, you should summarize the findings - mention the fact that we known very little about this subject given the scarcity of evidence and then perhaps say that most of the proposed examples of dimorphism have to do with parts of the skeleton (again, because that's the extent of our evidence). You should definitely try to write the lead in accessible terms - some of the lingo in the sections is too technical. Josef Horáček (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

I am doing my lead on Oak Street in New Orleans, because they had no lead and it was on the list. But now that I'm attempting to write the lead i've realized that it doesn't have much information on the page and that I was basically repeating the same post that is on there. I don't know if I should still post it or just find a different article that has more substance….. What do you suggest I do? Smac504 (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned on your sandbox talk page, I think you should find another article. Josef Horáček (talk) 19:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

I added the lead section to my article!Princessti (talk) 03:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey Josef, I corrected my lead section.Princessti (talk) 02:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC) Okay, I revised my lead section.Princessti (talk) 03:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC) Josef Horáček (talk)

Change in your user rights
Your Wikipedia account was previously granted a user right called "course instructor" by the Wiki Education Foundation. That right enabled you to create a course page through the EducationProgram MediaWiki extension. Starting in fall 2015, the Wiki Education Foundation has discontinued its use of this extension. Going forward, users should create course pages through the Wiki Education Foundation website. That application is more user-friendly, and any content is automatically mirrored to Wikipedia. To prevent confusion, we'll be removing your "course instructor" user right, as it is not needed with the new system. This is simply a notification of the technical change to your account. No action is needed from you at this time.

If you plan on teaching with Wikipedia for the fall 2015 term, please email me (helaine@undefinedwikiedu.org) for instructions how to create your next course page using our new system. --Helaine (Wiki Ed) (talk), sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)