User talk:Josejuisae

Welcome!

Hello, Josejuisae, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Nick-D (talk) 07:49, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

In response to your feedback
Hi Josejuisae. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm wondering if your feedback indicates that you have encountered a bot, and are confused by its actions? Tedder is one of the bot operators on Wikipedia, and would surely love to know if one of his bots is misbehaving. Editors are encouraged to use talk pages to discuss any disagreements or disputes they have.

If something Tedder or one of his bots has done has upset you in some way, I encourage you to contact him on his talk page. However strongly you may feel about whatever has happened, please try to remain calm and explain the issue clearly.

If I have completely misunderstood the feedback you left and have just confused you, please feel free to leave a message for me on my talk page, and I'll try to help you any way I can.

 fredgandt  01:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Academy Hill for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Academy Hill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Academy Hill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AKS (talk) 11:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Chadwick1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Chadwick1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Chadwick School, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 05:02, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Lindsay Davenport Chadwick.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lindsay Davenport Chadwick.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Mommie Dearest image on Chadwick School
Hi! I wanted to let you know that I reverted your good-faith addition of the image of the Mommie Dearest cover from the above page. That copyrighted image was uploaded under the "fair use" exception to the copyright rules, which only allow its use "to illustrate an article discussing the book in question". "Other use of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be copyright infringement. See Non-free content for more information." The quotes are directly from the fair-use rationale at File:MommieDearestBook.jpg. Too bad, as it looked really nice on the page. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Windward
Hi. I've reverted the alteration you made to the redirection page Windward in January. As you can see from the page history it has been redirected to Windward and leeward since 2005 and it's used in dozens of articles: Special:WhatLinksHere/Windward. I would guess that it's also more likely that someone searching for or linking to winward is looking this article rather than an unremarkable school in Los Angeles. Redirect has more information. Barret (talk) 23:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)