User talk:Joselv83/sandbox

Acknowledgements
Thank you all for your Reviews, it is greatly appreciated!

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Name of student reviewer: User: Cgchapman Replace with username for version on talk page**

Date of review: 05/10/2013

Name of editor: User: Joselv83 Replace with username for version on talk page**

URL of editor’s Userpage:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/10/2013

Date review submitted to instructor:

Length of edit (too long/too short): Good length

Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Edit information accurate to textbook

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Edit information accurate and relevant to I/O Psychology

Wikiformatting: Good Formatting

Grammar & composition: Good grammer

Other comments:None

Cgchapman (talk) 15:56, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
--Keronica Grant (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * }

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Neffateriet (talk) 9:36, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Azahur (talk) 04:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
F.Moshammad (talk) 05:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Name of student reviewer: Alyssa Bhagwandin

Date of review: 5/15/2013

Name of editor Wikipedia User: Wikipedia User: Joselv83

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joselv83/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/15/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 05/15/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Length was good wasn’t too short or long

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): information from the text was accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes it is adherent to I/O Psychology

Wikiformatting: good formatting

Grammar & composition: grammar and composition was good

Other comments: good job!

User:A_Bhagwandin (talk)