User talk:JosephMichaelChic

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User talk:Myk60640 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  Wayne Olajuwon  chat   00:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page American Action Network has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Action-Network/239452426714. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Chamber of Commerce
Think Progress is a partisan website that presents information from a liberal point of view. They are not suitable for factual statements, especially when making factual statements about entities that which they disagree with on an ideological basis. They are a reliable source for their own opinion about a subject, and you do see other partisan sources used for opinion or criticism against a subject of the opposite ideology. If you want to make factual statements find iron clad reliable sources that make the statement, just don't use sourcing that can be questioned based on their own personal ideological bias. Arzel (talk) 19:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)


 * "I would appreciate your answering my questions, or I will take this further to discussion, mediation or other solutions."
 * Threats are not an avenue which you should be taking. Further threats will be ignored without any response.  Now, do you want to have a civil conversation?  Arzel (talk) 00:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)