User talk:JosephSmithMarriedA14yearOldGirl

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is trolling or other disruptive behavior ever tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text on your user talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 23:36, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Note to reviewing admins: I blocked this account because the clearly disruptive intent of this name drew two people to report it to UAA. Perhaps we should amend the UHB template to state this for cases like these. I can't imagine a name like this not attracting unwelcome attention from other editors, particularly those of the LDS persuasion. I can't imagine that not being the intent, especially given the disingenuously coquettish "Who, me?" tone of the unblock request (in which the user does not deny that he is a troll). Daniel Case (talk) 00:11, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * In fairness, it may not be an intent to troll LDS editors, but rather a misguided ministry of some kind by disseminating a common anti-Mormon trope throughout Mormonism related articles via edit history. It's actually quite a clever tactic regardless of the intent, but it's obviously a misuse of Wikipedia mechanisms in order to advance a non-encyclopedic agenda, despite the actual benefit of the constructive copyedits the account has made. alanyst 00:18, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

One last question-- Would the usernames HelenMarKimballExisted or ThereIsAnArticleOnHelenMarKimball break any rules? Seriously wondering what could be offensive about this...
 * I believe your choice(s) in username raises the question of whether you are actually here to build an encyclopedia which may explain why you are experiencing so much difficulty. Might I suggest that something short like User:SugarAndSpice is enough to make your point ~Adjwilley (talk) 19:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Since you have made no attempt to have your username changed in over 5 weeks, the block has been restored. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:59, 15 January 2014 (UTC)