User talk:Joseph A. DeVito

Image copyright problem with Image:Fig. 09-01.pdf
Thank you for uploading Image:Fig. 09-01.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 18:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of DeVito’s model
A tag has been placed on DeVito’s model requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Menti  fisto  00:39, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I have removed the 'speedy' tag because the article does not merit it right now - although it is poorly formatted in comparison to other articles here. This can be fixed with some work of course, but there is a further problem which is that I assume from your username that there is a conflict of interest here. This does mean that you know more about the subject than the rest of us, but makes it hard for you to edit with a neutral point of view. Can you point to some sources to establish the notability of this model? Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk to me)  00:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)