User talk:Josephinaafig

Welcome!
Hello, Josephinaafig, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Josephina Figueroa- peer review
You did a great job articulating the World Bank and Belarus! I know there is limited information about Belarus and the World Bank, the information you did provide was thoughtfully articulated. I haven't done much research on the World Bank and Belarus and it surprised me to learn about the money the bank has provided to combat climate change. You would think Lukashenko would be more concerned about this issue than he is considering the 1986 radioactive disaster. With that being said here is some feedback: 1. Your lead is easy to understand, but I feel as though you provided a lot of information on the Belarus' past history, and not too much on the actual relations of the world Bank and Belarus. If this was a history section of Belarus I'd understand but maybe stay on topic of the World Bank. 2.You did great with your different headings. I like how you added each independent bank of the World Bank and their contributions to Belarus. You can maybe add a bit more information on each of their loans- how did the loans help the economy? were they paid back? Also great job with embedding links to other Wikipedia articles. 3. Your article sort of came across against the World Bank, try to stay neutral in your approach. Like I said, the over information of Belarus history that isn't about the World Bank and their relations seems unnecessary. 4. You might want to go back and reread your sentences, as I caught some grammatical errors. Make sure you don't have any run-on sentences and rearrange your wording to ensure you're conveying your message in a concise and articulate way that is easy for the reader. 5. You did well with your sources! Make sure they're from reputable sites and not from blogs. Overall, you referred to great sources and they obtain valid information. 00:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Josephinaafig (talk)Josephina Figueroa Josephinaafig (talk) 00:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Josephinaafig