User talk:Josh.172

Proposed deletion of Naanol Tesfaye


The article Naanol Tesfaye has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 18:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Naanol Tesfaye for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naanol Tesfaye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Naanol Tesfaye until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 20:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:05, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

 * You can consider WP:Standard offer. Best wishes. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 14:56, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * As is said above.


 * WP:sockpuppetry is a serious matter. My advice would be to list all other accounts you have edited under.
 * Abstain from editing for six months.
 * After six months request the WP:standard offer. At that time you will need to address any other issues I might not be aware of.--Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 16:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Unblock
comments on accUser:ATZNA
 * You had better use to edit. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * We blocked not only your accounts or IP but also your person. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * You need to request unblock from your original account, *not* create new accounts while that one is blocked. I have revoked talk page access for this account. User:Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)


 * You "have not created an account for months now"? You created User:ATZNA just days ago, and were socking with it until it was blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:57, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes I have not created more socks - After I was blocked a few months ago I stopped editing in Wikipedia. I came back a few days ago with User:ATZNA as my main, and now I'm blocked but I have not done anything rong and I have helped tons with AfDs, reviewing, fixing etcetera... view my User:ATZNA contribs if you'd like. Josh.172 (talk) 22:00, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Creating a new account while your old one is still blocked *is* doing something wrong. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:51, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Please - Comment: please view my contribs .- I have helped so much and I am very sorry for my sock creations 2 months ago, I had a clean start with User:ATZNA and I got blocked only because of my previous ban. I have only the best intentions to create and help in Wikipedia and I have served a 2 month ban. Could I please now get my unblock so I can continue edit activ as I've did here view my contribs . Thank you. Josh.172 (talk) 11:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * No, you did *not* have a clean start with User:ATZNA, as a clean start is *not allowed* while you are under existing sanctions. User:ATZNA was a prohibited sock account. I suggest the WP:Standard Offer is your best chance now. If you continue to refuse to listen to what you are being told, you are going to lose access to this talk page too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:52, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * - I served 2 months, WP:Standard Offer says 6 moths - is it not possible for me to get an unblock now? you can view my contribs. on my ATZNA account, all edits are very much for the community and I have done 270 edits in 3 days, and plan on editing much on my free time. I feel I have been blocked for 2 months which is enough. - May you let me edit on my User:ATZNA - The reason why I created a new account as a fresh start is because this account block says it will not expire. Josh.172 (talk) 11:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * As you are still refusing to listen, I have revoked your talk page access. The admin who reviews your unblock request can reinstate it if they think it is wise. Failing that, contact WP:UTRS after a minimum of six months and ask them to reinstate your talk page access so you can make a WP:Standard Offer request. And that's six months from your last edit with User:ATZNA - I will tell you for one final time that you have *not* served a 2-month block, as you have been socking with User:ATZNA as recently as just days ago. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:05, 21 April 2018 (UTC)