User talk:Josh.rodrigues

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Josh.rodrigues/Catch Digital has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Catch Digital, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. Petan-Bot (talk) 18:14, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:13, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Catch Digital


A tag has been placed on Catch Digital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Monty 845  16:15, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Catch Digital
Hi Josh. I saw your message about Catch Digital. I've got some good news and bad news for you. The good news is that if you are the owner of the text, you can submit a ticket to our OTRS help desk saying that you release the text, and it can be reused on Wikipedia and elsewhere without a problem.

The bad news is, we can't really use "as-is" "about us" text from a company's website as the basis for an article. We need third-party sources: for example, a newspaper or magazine profile of the company. I did not see any of those in the deleted article. I strongly suggest rounding up those first, as an article without third-party references is very likely to be deleted, and I know it would be frustrating to see your work deleted two times for two different reasons. Please take a moment to review our verifiability policy and notability guideline; these pages help spell out what Wikipedia's about, and a good understanding of these is key to avoiding deletion.

Let me know if you have any questions, or if I can otherwise assist. 28bytes (talk) 01:11, 14 October 2011 (UTC)