User talk:Josh2221

2015 AFC Asian Cup Final
I've said it there, but I'm telling you here: no live updates per WP:LIVESCORES. Once again, I ask you to respect that. If you continue to live update, I might have to report you. So please wait for the match to be over. Thanks Gsfelipe94 (talk) 10:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia (please see WP:NOT for further details). ''I have tidied up your user page for this reason and to remove vandalism from other editors. '' —S MALL  JIM   10:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Josh2221


A tag has been placed on User:Josh2221 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &#160; Discant X  02:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Josh2221 (talk) 06:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC) It is a valid page, but people keep vandalising it - These people really don't like me. If i could make it protected so only admins and me could edit it that would be great if someone could show me how to do it


 * I've deleted everything. If you want to start it again, I am prepared to protect it.  Create it first and let me know.Deb (talk) 08:53, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


 * ...but first, read WP:NOTWEBHOST and Wikipedia is not about YOU. Wikipedia is not a social-networking site. Your user page should be mainly about you as a Wikipedia contributor and your work here. You can find out more about Wikipedia at the WP:Welcome page and the WP:Introduction; also, please read Guidance for younger editors. JohnCD (talk) 10:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I could restore the very first version (the one with the flags), which was fine. Is that what you'd like? Deb (talk) 16:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

That would be great!

Hi Josh2221, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Guidance for younger editors and On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages!  Snowolf How can I help? 15:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Warwick Grove
Hello Josh2221,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Warwick Grove for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vvvaggot (talk) 13:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Warwick Grove


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Warwick Grove requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. North America1000 17:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Only in Hindsight


A tag has been placed on Only in Hindsight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kolbasz (talk) 08:15, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Only in Hindsight


A tag has been placed on Only in Hindsight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Josh2221 (talk) 09:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Inside The Sea (band)"
Inside The Sea (band), a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular..

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David.moreno72 (talk) 12:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Inside The Sea (band)
Draft:Inside The Sea (band), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Inside The Sea (band) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Inside The Sea (band) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 06:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey Josh - welcome to Wikipedia. Sorry you are having trouble. There are guidelines for content and it is hard to find topics that are valid WP:N topics that don't already exist. Many active editors rarely create new pages. I suggest working on improving existing articles for a while to get a feel for what is appropriate before trying to create new pages. Check out the To Do lists here for a good start. Work on topics you find interesting. It can take time to get the hang of this place. Good luck and I hope to see you editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:10, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, it is very easy to find notable topics that do not have articles, but a lot of editors are enthusiasts not true encyclopedists. If an editor is interested in music, then they should know that every documented hit song is notable. There are vast numbers of well documented hit songs from the 1920s through 1950s that have no articles, and many of those songs are still performed today. Every state and provincial legislator is presumed notable. There are vast numbers of legislators over centuries who lack articles, and the libraries of state and provincial capitals are packed full of information in reliable sources. Every Olympic athlete is presumed notable and vast Olympic archives are readily available. Yet large numbers of Olympic athletes lack biographies. And so on. What is true is that notable 21st century pop culture topics without articles are rare. But this is not a pop culture encyclopedia. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * As a fellow West Aussie, who appreciates local bands & what they've been able to achieve, I'd been more than happy to work with you in improve your article on Inside the Sea. There was a time when I wrote an article of Drapht, which other editors felt should be deleted because there was no way a hip hop artist from Perth was ever going to be notable. So don't get discouraged - let them know that there really is something in the water over here. Dan arndt (talk) 08:44, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Inside The Sea (band)


Hello, Josh2221. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Inside The Sea".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)