User talk:Josh5959

December 2021
Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Billy Graham, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 19:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Brown Paper Bag Test has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 19:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Billy Graham, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brown Paper Bag Test. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:51, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Billy Graham, you may be blocked from editing. You edits there has been reverted because it is unsourced so please do not undo the revert. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 01:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history at Brown Paper Bag Test and Billy Graham shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 01:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Billy Graham. Sundayclose (talk) 01:42, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * You have repeatedly added unsourced information and have been reverted by more than one editor. Furthermore, you have refused to discuss your edits on article talk pages. If there's something about "unsourced" that you don't understand, ask right here, right now. Otherwise after your next unsourced edit you will lose you editing privileges. Sundayclose (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 23:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Brown paper bag test.
I am being accused of engaging in an edit war, but I was the first one to make the edit and you continually change my edit. Doesn't that make you just as guilty of engaging in an edit war? Josh5959 (talk) 11:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Three MAJOR problems:
 * Edit warring has nothing to do with who made the first edit. You haven't bothered to click any of the links and read the relevant policies. Here they are again. READ THEM and abide by them: WP:EW, WP:3RR, WP:BRD, WP:CON, WP:DR.
 * You have not cited a single reliable source for any of your edits on either Billy Graham or Brown Paper Bag Test. Click WP:V. READ IT and abide by it.
 * You have completely refused to discuss on article talk pages when your edits have been challenged. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Refusing to communicate is not an option.
 * If you can't be bothered to read policies that are linked for you, abide by them, and communicate with other editors, this is not the place for you. There are many wikis, blogs, and message boards throughout the internet that would allow your unsourced comments and opinions. Spend your time on them instead of wasting everyone's time here. All the warnings you have received remain in effect. If you make one more unsourced edit or violate any of the policies linked, you will lose your editing privileges. Sundayclose (talk) 16:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Sources belong in articles, not edit summaries. In the mean time, go to Talk:Billy Graham. Give us direct quotations from the source you mention that confirm everything in your edit and how it is relevant to improving the Billy Graham article. Wait for others to discuss and let a consensus develop that supports your edit. DO NOT make the edit again without consensus. Sundayclose (talk) 17:17, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Fine, little boy. Enjoy your toy that you're not going to let anybody else play with. Merry christmas! lol Josh5959 (talk) 21:26, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

"not very civil" lol Josh5959 (talk) 20:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

September 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Buford Pusser, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Schazjmd  (talk)  14:28, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Cry babies
Come one come all! Let your sniveling, crying voices be heard about edits you don't like 😭😭😭🤡🤡🤡 Josh5959 (talk) 13:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Yamla (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2023 (UTC)