User talk:JoshC2017

Speedy deletion nomination of Gid development


A tag has been placed on Gid development, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Quasar G  t - c 21:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelly Klein (photographer)
Hello JoshC2017,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kelly Klein (photographer) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 01:37, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kelly Klein (photographer)
Hello, JoshC2017. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kelly Klein (photographer), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Notables need sources
Your recent edits to the article Upper East Side, have added dozens of entries for notables with no source connecting them to the neighborhood. The list is already lacking in required sources and the addition of unsourced entries only aggravates the problem. Please be sure to add entries to this article only with a reliable and verifiable source establishing a connection to the Upper East Side. Alansohn (talk) 19:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * You have also added several that are redlinks, which makes it uncertain at best if they are "notable". I've removed them. Twice (WP:BRD concern). See WP:BIO to learn what this means, and WP:WTAF/WP:NLIST for some additional thoughts and guidance. DMacks (talk) 16:35, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Upper East Side, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Ross ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Upper_East_Side check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Upper_East_Side?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Portal (Podcast), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Douglas Murray and Eric Lewis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of The Portal (podcast) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Portal (podcast) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Portal (podcast) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:56, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)