User talk:Josh Tumath/monobook.js

Edit request on 30 October 2012
- please fix the double redirect. Rich Farmbrough, 03:44, 30 October 2012 (UTC).


 * Redirects don't work with .js and .css pages; would it be better to delete it instead as ? -- Red rose64 (talk) 09:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Probably. I notice that there are a number of links but I suspect it doesn't matter too much which. A redirect will act as a soft redirect.  Rich Farmbrough, 12:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC).


 * I've checked several of those links - all of the ones that I checked are only linked to User:Titan602/monobook.js because that page is linked from User:AnomieBOT/PERTable‎ which is transcluded onto those user pages, either directly or via the . To test this theory, I'm setting yes above; if I'm correct, the WhatLinksHere should drop to a very small number, possibly zero, when the job queue has finished. -- Red rose64 (talk) 00:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Just as I thought:

Pages that link to "User:Titan602/monobook.js" From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ← User:Titan602/monobook.js Jump to: navigation, search What links here Page: Namespace: Filters Hide transclusions | Hide links | Hide redirects

No pages link to User:Titan602/monobook.js
 * Thus, I've [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&dir=prev&offset=20121030090138&limit=1&user=Redrose64 zapped the page] under WP:CSD. Regarding User:Mephiles602/monobook.js which is also a redirect, this is presently exempt from U2, because it's [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&page=User%3AMephiles602 a recently-renamed user]. -- Red rose64 (talk) 08:39, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Nice, that only leaves AMLATHEAS pages and the canonical example pages. Rich Farmbrough, 03:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC).


 * Er, which are those, specifically? -- Red rose64 (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * User:Amalthea/rd1 →‎ User:Amalthea/rd2 →‎ User:Amalthea/rdtarget
 * and
 * Example of a double redirect →‎ Double redirect →‎ Double redirects
 * Really only the second one should be needed, but AMALTHEA has used the first in a bugzilla.
 * Rich Farmbrough, 17:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC).


 * Ah, so you're saying to leave these two instances alone, yes? -- Red rose64 (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, unless you want to ask/suggest to AMALTHEA that those ones can go? Rich Farmbrough, 19:48, 5 November 2012 (UTC).


 * Not really; I'm happy to leave those, since they apparently have a purpose. -- Red rose64 (talk) 20:36, 5 November 2012 (UTC)