User talk:Josh simo

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Erwinloh 05:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

AfD Nomination: The Vapour Boys
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that The Vapour Boys meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/The Vapour Boys. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? CyberGhostface (talk) 16:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Buchanan (band)


A tag has been placed on Buchanan (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Buchanan (band) and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CarmellaChock (talk) 10:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

FYI conflict of interest guideline
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia in The Vapour Boys, Buchanan (band), or other articles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * see also: Wikipedia is not a soapbox and User pages
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉  19:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Quick Comment
I wanted to give a quick reply to your now-deleted reply.

I was not trying to humiliate you or your band with my comments, so I certainly hope you don't feel I was trying to insult you (I wasn't). But as a matter of note, your prior messages unfortunately will have a permanent record; in fact, I am finding it here. Pretty much any contribution to Wikipedia has a permanent record in the page's history. So it's impossible to delete the record, but I do note that you've effectively ended the discussion and will not carry it on further. I do wish your band well and hope we do hear good things about it someday over here in North America. =) CycloneGU (talk) 04:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks mate - definitely won't make the same mistake again! Will leave to management in the future I think!
 * Well, even management has a COI - they promote the group, so they of course want you to sell records and the COI could be inferred by that fact. It really should be an independent person who creates the page.  Let me give you an example.


 * I have watched our hometown hockey team, the Sarnia Sting, for the entire season. They aren't making the playoffs (final game is 2morrow), but I noticed that Nail Yakupov didn't have an article.  Furthermore, he had a red link (a Wikilink with no article behind it) on three pages.  I created his article.  If he himself had created it, or anyone on Sting management, or even another player on the team or management at the arena they play at, those could all be COIs.  I myself am simply a huge fan of the player (who is setting OHL records already and is certain to be Rookie of the Year) and therefore there is no COI.  Further, he's notable having played for various special teams and for being Rookie of the Week several times already, not to mention the recent records.  But even so, if someone else from the team created his article and it was found (would be difficult, mind), it would have been deleted even if it looked similar to what I have posted simply because of the COI.  So thus, don't ask management to take over the task; there is still a COI.


 * On that note, anything on which you don't have a possible (or direct) COI you are welcome to edit and we look forward to your contributions. We only ask to stay away from articles about yourself in a sense. =)  CycloneGU (talk) 13:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * As a side note, after posting this I found the article undeleted for reasons explained here. It is also evident that another editor made the point that deletion from his talk page is that users' decision.  Definitely teaches the random user not to be slanderous or mean in their posts (not saying you were, just in general) because people will see literally everything you post. =)  Article may still be deleted in the future however for other reasons, including COI.  CycloneGU (talk) 13:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Buchananband.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Buchananband.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:53, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Buchananband.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Buchananband.jpg, which you've sourced to "Photograph created by Dyllan Corbett on behalf of Buchanan". I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:24, 21 March 2012 (UTC)