User talk:JoshaGibby

September 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Army Men has been reverted. Your edit here to Army Men was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://armymen.wikia.com/wiki/Army_Men_(game), http://armymen.wikia.com/wiki/Army_Men_3D) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:03, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Army Men: Video game
Hello JoshaGibby,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Army Men: Video game for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

First article
Please read WP:My first article. This may help prevent the Army Men: Video game page you re-created being deleted, again. 220  of  Borg 04:53, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Army Men: Video game


A tag has been placed on Army Men: Video game requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.amazon.com/Army-Men-Freedom-Pack-II-Pc/dp/product-description/B00002EIWZ. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VQuakr (talk) 07:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Your addition to Army Men has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''I reverted your edits to Army Men, because effectively all of the new prose appeared to be either cut and pasted or paraphrased from other sources such as armymen.wikia.com. Please review and understand our policy on copyright before editing an article again.'' VQuakr (talk) 07:17, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Army Men: Air Combat -The Elite Missions


A tag has been placed on Army Men: Air Combat -The Elite Missions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gamefaqs.com/gamecube/561960-army-men-air-combat-the-elite-missions?question_title=Army+Men%3A+Air+Combat+-+The+Elite+Missions. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VQuakr (talk) 21:05, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

I didn't vandalize the page Army Men. All I did in my edit before getting blocked was apply the proper information. When it came to the release dates under all the producers of the game series as well as the developers. I improved the article by adding the proper producers and developers. Instead of the default by two that the article said were involved with making the games. Also Army Men III I removed this only because it is not a real Army Men game produced with the proper rights and assets permissions. The game itself violates the Army Men trademark title by using it in the name. Since they have not properly obtained the brand name. What is the problem with removing a game that is not even supposed to exist since it did not have the proper permissions before creating the game and releasing it on here. They claim that it's the final installation to the Army Men series when it never got the permission to be so. That is a great reason to remove content that should not be part of the series article on Wikipedia since it's violating that trademark that they don't own the rights to. It's not a official Army Men game let alone the fact a legal game to exist on this Wikipedia article. Also where have I been at fault on this last edit that got me blocked.JoshaGibby (talk) 03:44, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * You were not blocked for removing content. You were blocked for repeated copyright violations, but that block was for 24 hours and has now expired. By adding text to Wikipedia articles, you are stating by clicking "save" that you are the author of the text that is being created per the terms of use. Instead, you copied chunks of text from the internet, which is violation of the original writer's copyright. Please note that just paraphrasing by changing a few words is also unacceptable. VQuakr (talk) 03:59, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Army Men Gaming Series Image.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Army Men Gaming Series Image.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 04:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

So when did this happen that I all of a sudden became blocked. Why since I didn't involve any copyright material in my last edit before becoming blocked from editing. I didn't violate anything during that time within just becoming blocked. In fact I got blocked today when I haven't commited any copyright violations. Why did I not become blocked ahead of this occurrence when I actually needed to be blocked during that time. Also you did not even mention anything about the fact that there is content on Wikipedia article Army Men that violates even a trademark. I guess that just gets a free pass because you feel like it. Well either way it violates the brand name. Yet it seems the injustice will continue by not removing such content. To be honest I could care less if a image I created myself to help showcase the article gets removed. What is more important to me is that the content of Army Men III does not have the rights to be on the Army Men article. Remove my photo but also the trademarked content that is being violated. I would remove such copyright violation of a photo if it was indeed possible for me to do so. However go through the process of wasting time on this instead of the trademark violation of a video game that your website promotes to the public by it existing on here. Seems I will never be at peace.--JoshaGibby (talk) 04:10, 15 September 2014 (UTC)JoshaGibby


 * You were blocked for 24 hours on Sept 10-11, as can be confirmed here. VQuakr (talk) 04:18, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Wow I didn't know of this maybe I wasn't on here during that time because of how badly things always go on here when I try to contribute to my favorite game series. That is basically the reason that I have been working on the idea of editing armymen.wikia instead. Anyways glad you continued to talk to me but saddened nothing has been done for the other problem. Just wish thing would work better more efficient when it comes focusing on other problems besides just the copyright violations. Anyways delete that photo it doesn't matter to me anymore the game series just has always been my favorite childhood games. I wanted the article on Wikipedia to reflect upon how great it is yet more of the content continues to get deleted as time goes by expecially the games in the series suffer most.--JoshaGibby (talk) 04:24, 15 September 2014 (UTC)JoshaGibby

File:Army Men Gaming Series Image.png

 * File:Army Men Gaming Series Image.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * There is a trademark violation in the article Army Men III when it comes to using the brand name without permission. Also delete the photo I created but I altered it in such a way that it doesn't even resembled that of the original image in which it came from. I had to change the corners the coloring contrast piece things together remove areas patch things mirror sides rearrange many pixels get things to fit properly recreate the brackets since I completely messed them up at first. The font is even whiter than it was filled in some pixels relating to this area. Mirrored the sides of one wing with the other. Completely added in the Real Combat. Plastic Men that was not even there before. I gathered that from another game box changed the brightness of that. Used a magic wand to get those cleaned up. smoothing the corners of the wings was a complicated part to this perfected it enough. Made sure the overall image had a nice army men style tint to it. You didn't pin point what image I used to create this. The real showing of the editing has more to do with this photo. so go ahead and just delete it. However I like how I had to completely remove that smoke coming on to the corners which I had to remove. As well as the head of the character protruding up into the image. There was a lot that went into making this it took time as you can see by all the content I described but it's okay with me if this is removed. Just remove that trademark violation of a game as well.--JoshaGibby (talk) 04:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)JoshaGibby


 * The "trademark" issue is a completely different subject than the copyright violations. I started a talk page discussion here; feel free to weigh in. Do you have a source for the game being a trademark violation? VQuakr (talk) 03:44, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Army Men. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 05:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)