User talk:Joshbc

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Roman Polanski has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. (ESkog)(Talk) 01:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits could give editors of Wikipedia the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a genuine dispute with the Community or its members, please use dispute resolution. (ESkog)(Talk) 01:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Roman Polanski constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  01:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Gamaliel (talk) 01:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for continued vandalism and legal threats. (ESkog)(Talk) 01:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

You are welcome to use the unblock template to contest your block. You are not welcome to use it to attack other editors and it will be removed if you do so again. If you persist in attacking other editors, then I will lock this page so you will be unable to contest your block on this page at all. Gamaliel (talk) 02:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I am simply stating the facts. None of my statements are meant to attack anyone.

I do not know much about wikipedia practices and it would be easy for me to open another account. However I do want to make a point about the people who are supporting this fugitive: here is his crime, and it should be emphasised ON THE VERY FIRST PARAGRAPH. "Polanski was charged with rape of a minor, rape by use of a drug, committing a lewd act upon a person less than 14 years of age, oral copulation, sodomy and furnishing drugs to a minor. He copped a plea to unlawful sex with a minor, but fled the country on the eve of his sentencing hearing." The article in not neutral, it is a glowing advertisement for this sex offender on the run from the US government, and whose movies are frankly very weak.

If I wanted to start legal action against someone, I would never advertise that on wikipedia. I would simply do it. At the moment I am not considering any such action, nor will I EVER advertise such actions on wikipedia. You have my word on that. I have never made or will in the future any legal threats on wikipedia. [personal attack removed] I does not matter whether I do anything about it.