User talk:Joshbosh123

Speedy deletion nomination of YouTube Easter eggs
Hello Joshbosh123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged YouTube Easter eggs for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Phil (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of YouTube Easter eggs


A tag has been placed on YouTube Easter eggs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Phil (talk) 22:38, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Please don't let my review of your new page dissuade you from making other contributions to Wikipedia. Just because one page may not be appropriate for inclusion on Wikipedia doesn't mean you don't have a lot of value to contribute. I always hope that when I mark a page this way from a new contributor it is more helpful as a learning experience rather than an attempt to discourage you. Phil (talk) 23:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I liked your response on the Talk page and referencing the Google Easter eggs list page. I do still think the page you created should not be a standalone page, but if you can provide secondary sources (like a news article describing the Easter eggs) rather than original research, I think you should actually include this content in that other page. There is actually a section there already for YouTube Easter eggs if you look. I hope you move the content to that section. Phil (talk) 00:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)