User talk:Joshhenery

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Wall Street, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 03:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Wall Street has been reverted. Your edit here to Wall Street was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/pages/TheAnonPress/194464753933126) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Wall Street. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wall Street, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Wall Street was changed by Joshhenery (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910652 on 2011-09-21T04:32:40+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Wall Street, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: wall st
Re your message: Wikipedia is not here to be your soapbox against the ills of the financial industry. Such issues are already covered in the Wall Street in the public imagination section in a neutral point of view. It is obvious from your style of writing that your are attempting to promote this particular event and your views on Wall Street. Please do not add in the content again. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Edit Warring
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Wall Street. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Alexf(talk) 18:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

The previous block was hard to make. Why? Because you gave us the choice of a shorter one for simply edit warring and 3RR violations or a much longer one (up to and indefinite period of time) for not maintaining a neutral point of view and for the contentious writing in your comments to another editor. We opted for the lesser one, as you can become a good editor and we value good contributors. Please read the policies and guidelines that govern Wikipedia. If you can contribute to enhance the encyclopedia, you are welcome. If you come to voice your opinion, maybe a place like Facebook or your own blog might be a better venue for you. Please consider what you want to do. We'd hate to lose you but we can arrange it if you persist. -- Alexf(talk) 18:07, 21 September 2011 (UTC)